Appointment of Ambassadors/High Commissioners

Appointment of Ambassadors/High Commissioners

 

The government’s ongoing move to fill up a good number of Ambassadorial posts abroad with political appointees, as reported in the media, points to a pattern that seems to be designed to overlook the career diplomats in the Foreign Ministry who are eligible for such appointments. We are watching with concern the way professional diplomats are being set aside for appointment of Ambassadors and High Commissioners. Although these appointments have not yet been officially announced except for one or two, it is learnt that in appointment of Ambassadors/High Commissioners, career diplomats have been totally bypassed. Even the Foreign Secretary, a career diplomat, has not found favour with this Government and there are rumours that he is being sent to the Foreign Service Academy as its Principal, a post traditionally given to retired diplomats or to those in the active service whom the Government of the day did not, for one reason or the other, wish to favour. In 1987, when then Foreign Secretary Fakhruddin Ahmed was sent to the Academy, he declined and spent the last remaining months of his service as an OSD and  later proudly walked out of the Ministry with his head high, not allowing then President Ershad to humiliate him.

 

The present trend will no doubt have a seriously demoralizing effect on the professional diplomatic service of the country. The trend is also in contravention with the rules of the foreign service as regards appointment of heads of missions abroad form the cadre. There is no denying that appointment of Ambassadors/High commissioners is the prerogative of the Government. But both practice and rules within which the BCS (FA) operates require the Government to appoint 70% of the Ambassadors/High Commissioners from the BCS (FA) cadre just as the Government is required to appoint 90% of the Secretaries of the Government from regularly constituted services.

 

There is also another very important element that appear to have been overlooked by  the government in proposing some of the appointments, as per newspaper reports. Some of the proposed appointees have dual citizenship. We are not aware of other dual nationalities, but in case of those who have US nationalities in addition to Bangladeshi one will run into legal problems. In a situation where such a person  in his/her capacity  as  Bangladesh Ambassador  has any information that goes against US interest, he would be obliged to hand this over to the US Government or else face charges of violation of citizenship rules. We are not sure if the Government while selecting  appointees with dual citizenship for representing the country abroad has taken into consideration such appointees may be exposed to the possibilities and risks of conflict of interest.

 

We do not question the Government’s right to appoint non-career Ambassadors at some of the key capitals. All government does this to varying degrees. US, that appoints very large number of non-career ambassadors that differs from one administration to another, appoints on an average about 33% non-career Ambassadors. We seem to be moving to a system where we will be the only country to appoint the majority of Ambassadors from non-career background and not-appoint any career diplomats to any of the key capitals.

 

It seems the Government has a plan here for they are breaking a system that has in the past brought the country significant results in the past. Most of all, we need to be careful that we are destroying a system of conducting diplomacy that is universal in nature. We cannot do so without a well thought out plan. We would like to know about such a plan for surely there must be one for such an innovation in the conduct of diplomatic relations. 

 

 

CFAS Editorial Board



COMMENTS:


I think the editorial on the appointment of Ambassadors/High Commissioners is a very appropriate one.It is clear that we have shown very little respect for the professionals.We hardly try to understand that sending a non-career diplomat(e.g an army general) to a key diplomatic position is more like sending a university professor to command troops in a battle field.

I hope our government understands this before it is too late and stop the malpractice of ploughing the field by goats instead of oxen.

 

Name: M Hossain

E-Mail: mash34th@hotmail.com




Send feedback:

Name:
E-mail:
Feedback: